« "How many plumbers do you know makin' a quarter million dollars a year?" | Main | Docs opining on McCains' prognosis divide into two groups: Those who know what they're talking about, and those who're guessing »

Saturday, October 18, 2008

A respectful nod to Paul Mirengoff

My latest guest-post at HughHewitt.com is about Paul Mirengoff of PowerLine, with whom I disagreed (and, I think, still do) regarding Gov. Palin. Paul's at least open to recognizing inconsistencies in the opinions expressed by other Palin critics from the right, in particular from Peggy Noonan. As to Ms. Noonan's recent comments, however, I think I'll maintain a silence now rather than say something ungracious that I might regret later, except for this: She badly needs a long vacation somewhere away from either coast or Chicago.

---------------------------------

[Copied here for archival purposes on November 5, 2008, from the post linked above at HughHewitt.com.]

(Guest Post by Bill Dyer a/k/a Beldar)

This post by PowerLine's Paul Mirengoff contains as thoughtful and gracious a set of observations as I've ever seen from a fellow conservative and lawyer-blogger with whom I've profoundly disagreed. On my own blog back in early September, I was among those who respectfully chided Paul for some of his initial skeptical reactions to Gov. Palin's nomination.

I don't mean to suggest that Paul has been converted to an unabashed Palin fan (which I readily acknowledge myself to be). But he's been open-minded. He's learned more of her record, and he's seen more of her as a campaigner. Now he's able to at least see the inconsistencies and emotional reactions of Palin critics like Peggy Noonan. Of himself, he now writes:

For a time, I was frustrated by my inability to make people see what was fairly apparent to me about Palin. But I have never resented robust expressions of disagreement, including the suggestion that I'm an "elitist." One should always be willing to entertain the possibility that one's perspective may be distorted. And I have certainly not confused robust expressions of disagreement with an attempt to silence me. They are, at worst, the manifestation of reader frustration with me for not seeing what is apparent to them.

That's fair enough, and courageous. There are many millions — and I think perhaps tens of millions — of voters who will cast their ballots for the McCain-Palin ticket because of, and not despite, Gov. Palin's presence on it. That's worth some respect, even from those who don't count themselves among those voters.

(And yes, before the commenters on the left jump me: I don't deny that the tens of millions of voters who I believe to be drunk on Obama's hopey-changitude hoo-hah are entitled to respect too. I am, and have always been, a small-d democrat, and while I don't think the voting public is by any means infallible, I think its collective judgments over time deserve a degree of reverence. That doesn't stop me from trying to sober up the drunkards on their way to the polls, though.)

— Beldar

Posted by Beldar at 02:14 AM in 2008 Election, Palin, Politics (2008) | Permalink

TrackBacks

Other weblog posts, if any, whose authors have linked to A respectful nod to Paul Mirengoff and sent a trackback ping are listed here:


Comments

(1) Stan made the following comment | Oct 19, 2008 2:10:27 PM | Permalink

Bill,

One thing that Paul and others need to address is one of the key reasons so many are thrilled by Palin -- the abject failure by conservative pundits and GOP politicians to do anything constructive about the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party (the MSM).

People are desperate for another Reagan because he was the only conservative who suceeded in getting a conservative message to the rest of the electorate. He got it done. Every other GOP politician and conservative pundit simply wrings their hands and whines about the unfairness of the MSM.

Palin has shown that she is a DOER. How refreshing! She's shown the guts to take on the MSM. How incredibly rare in a Republican!

For me to get excited about a Republican in an election today, the first requirement is that they demonstrate a willingness to confront the MSM and the Dems. Other than Palin, can Paul name one?

The comments to this entry are closed.