« Traffic update, with my thanks to linkers and especially readers! | Main | Jim Russell and other witnesses of uncertain provenance appearing from out of the woodwork »
Sunday, August 22, 2004
WaPo lets new Kerry ad lie go unremarked, mocks Dole, and republishes Russell account as gospel
My hopes that WaPo would maintain its pace of digging into the real issues of the SwiftVets vs. Kerry controversy are unfulfilled, at least by tomorrow's edition as online tonight. Its new story by staff writers Lois Romano and David Nakamura presents a weak grab-bag of developments with not a hint of actual reporting to be found in it.
WaPo leads off with news that Sen. Kerry is planning to run counter-advertisements in battleground states asking the Bush campaign to denounce the SwiftVets' ads. Here's the new Kerry ad:
American soldiers are fighting in Iraq. Families struggle to afford healthcare; jobs heading overseas. Instead of solutions, George Bush's campaign supports a front group attacking John Kerry's military record, attacks called "smears, lies." Senator McCain calls them "dishonest." Bush smeared John McCain four years ago. Now he's doing it to John Kerry. George Bush, denounce the smear. Get back to the issues. America deserves better.
Probably most viewers of the ad won't know that by law, Bush can't coordinate with or direct a 527 organization like the SwiftVets. Perhaps he could "denounce" the SwiftVets' ads without violating campaign finance laws, although even that is far from clear. What is entirely clear, however, is that this ad is simply wrong in stating that "George Bush's campaign supports a front group attacking John Kerry's military record." Not even the Kerry campaign's extremely strained claims of improper coordination between the Bush campaign and the SwiftVets in its FEC complaint come close to approaching a showing that the Bush campaign "supports" the SwiftVets as a "front group."
Update: WaPo's Howard Kurtz, in his "Ad Watch" column, notes (boldface mine):
There is no evidence that the Bush campaign "supports a front group" that produced the attack ad. There are numerous ties between Bush aides and the veterans' backers, but there are similar ties between Kerry and some liberal groups running anti-Bush ads. Bush and his top strategists, however, have passed up numerous opportunities to condemn the Swift boat ad, calling instead for a moratorium on all advertising by outside groups.
(Hat-tip to Jim Garaghty's Kerry Spot on NRO.) Mr. Kurtz, perhaps you should clue in your colleagues, Ms. Romano and Mr. Nakamura.
This WaPo article goes on to report about former Sen. Bob Dole's scathing remarks about Kerry:
Yesterday [Sunday], former senator Robert J. Dole (R-Kan.), a World War II veteran and the GOP's 1996 nominee, attacked Kerry, agreeing with critics. "One day he's saying that we were shooting civilians, cutting off their ears, cutting off their heads, throwing away his medals or his ribbons," Dole said on CNN's "Late Edition." "The next day he's standing there, 'I want to be president because I'm a Vietnam veteran.' Maybe he should apologize to all the other 2.5 million veterans who served. He wasn't the only one in Vietnam."
Dole also questioned Kerry's commendations. "Three Purple Hearts and never bled that I know of," Dole said of the medal one gets for a combat injury. "I mean, they're all superficial wounds. And as far as I know, he's never spent one day in the hospital. I don't think he draws any disability pay. He doesn't have any disability. And boasting about three Purple Hearts when you think of some of the people who really got shot up in Vietnam."
Dole erroneously stated, "He got two in one day, I think." Kerry's Purple Hearts were received for different injuries over his four-month tour in Vietnam, during which he also received a Silver Star and a Bronze Star. Kerry spokesman Chad Clanton said, "It's unfortunate that senator Dole is making statements that U.S. Navy records prove false."
I don't have a full transcript of Sen. Dole's remarks. I'd be curious to see whether, in context, Dole was still referring exclusively to Purple Hearts, or to medals generally, when he was quoted as saying, "He got two in one day, I think." Because if so, Sen. Dole was absolutely correct — the Bay Hap River action and perhaps the exploding rice pile that preceded it on March 13, 1969, produced both Sen. Kerry's Bronze Star and his third Purple Heart.
Hey, Chad Clanton! I'll bet you don't have the guts to say that to Bob Dole's face. And you obviously lack the integrity to say to WaPo, "He didn't get two Purple Hearts in one day, he got a Purple Heart and a Bronze Star in one day instead."
The WaPo article also picks up and reprints the new Jim Russell version of the Bay Hap River action, the Rassmann rescue, and Kerry's Bronze Star, quoting from Mr. Russell's letter to the editor in the Telluride newspaper today. There's nothing else there — no verification of Mr. Russell's history, no comment on the inconsistencies between his story and those of other Kerry supporters. Apparently the letter's appearance on the "letters to the editor" page of the Telluride Daily Planet is verification enough for all America to rely upon.
For those unfamiliar with Telluride, Colorado (population 2221), its name is pronounced — as locals will tell you with glee — "To Hell You Ride!" Great place to retire, wonderful little mountain village; it's not much noted for its international investigative journalism, until now. If I were a WaPo reporter sweating in the DC heat of August, I can't think of a much better assignment than heading for Telluride right about now.
----------------
Update: Per tomorrow's NYT story about the new Kerry ad and Dole's remarks:
"John Kerry's a hero," Mr. Dole told Wolf Blitzer. "But what I will always quarrel about are the Purple Hearts. I mean, the first one, whether he ought to have a Purple Heart — he got two in one day, I think. And he was out of there in less than four months, because three Purple Hearts and you're out."
Mr. Kerry did not receive two Purple Hearts for events of the same day. He received them for the events of Dec. 2, 1968, Feb. 20, 1969, and March 13, 1969. Mr. Kerry often acknowledges that his wounds were not severe, but he still has shrapnel in his left thigh from the firefight that led to his second Purple Heart.
Well, okay. It appears that Sen. Dole may have thought two Purple Hearts came on one day. Nice of the NYT to correct him. Would it have been, oh, maybe semi-decent journalism to also reveal as part of the snarky correction that Kerry did get a second, and far more rare, medal for the events of March 13, 1969?
The other interesting bit from the NYT piece:
[Democratic strategist Bill] Carrick and other Democrats said that this was a risky moment for Mr. Kerry's campaign.
"They've turned this into a raging national press story," Mr. Carrick said of the Swift boat group. "It is certainly keeping Kerry from discussing his own issues and agenda and getting on the offensive."
Another Democrat close to the campaign, who asked not to be quoted by name, was more dire.
"When you're basically running on your biography and there are ongoing attacks that are undermining the credibility of your biography, you have a really big problem."
Ayup.
Posted by Beldar at 11:55 PM in Mainstream Media, Politics (2006 & earlier), SwiftVets | Permalink
TrackBacks
Other weblog posts, if any, whose authors have linked to WaPo lets new Kerry ad lie go unremarked, mocks Dole, and republishes Russell account as gospel and sent a trackback ping are listed here:
Comments
(1) Deb made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 1:57:02 AM | Permalink
NYT typoed. Second PH was 28 Feb 69 - not 20 Feb 69. :o
(2) Deb made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 2:02:00 AM | Permalink
Oops, strike that. I'm wrong. Need sleep - memory failing...
(3) Gary B. made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 2:18:30 AM | Permalink
It's too bad that Al Gore invented the internet when he did. If he would've waited another 10 years Kerry might have been able to pull his scam off. But I do think maybe VH1 should do a "driven" episode on him, because he's obviously was focused, calculating and motivated to succeed in a political career.
This along with Joe Wilson and Sandy Berger should be put in a movie.
(4) M. Simon made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 5:19:21 AM | Permalink
John Kerry like Richard Nixon went to China. We know what Nixon went for.
John Kerry will not say what he went for.
What is the War Hero Afraid of?
Form 180. Release ALL the records.
(5) M. Simon made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 5:30:28 AM | Permalink
I think of the "marble" scene in "Home Alone" so far the Kerry team after dancing furiously is still standing. Just.
I'm looking forward to the final fall into the pit.
Just to give the Kerry team some more dance music:
--==--
John Kerry like Richard Nixon went to China. We know what Nixon went for.
Kerry will not say what he went for.
What is the War Hero Afraid of?
Form 180. Release ALL the records.
(6) Chris made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 9:01:19 AM | Permalink
What, is Bob Dole's Viagra spokesman career fading? Does he forget that his own first Purple Heart came on a nick from grenade shrapnel, which was--to quote his own autobiography--"the sort of injury the Army patched up with Mercurochrome and a Purple Heart."
RE: "Perhaps he could 'denounce' the SwiftVets' ads without violating campaign finance laws, although even that is far from clear."
I find that to be a highly dubious statement. Kerry has already done just that with the MoveOn ad.
(7) Paul Zrimsek made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 10:45:53 AM | Permalink
Not sure I understand the point about the two medals. Is there supposed to be something irregular about getting both a Purple Heart and some other decoration for a single action?
(8) Beldar made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 4:54:31 PM | Permalink
Chris, the new law hasn't been interpreted in court. It doesn't make clear what constitutes coordination or direction. If I were advising a client, I'd tell him to avoid saying anything that could be interpreted as encouraging or discouraging any particular ad. That Sen. Kerry may choose to treat the campaign finance laws as a joke or take risks that his statements might violate them is a very poor reason for President Bush to do likewise.
(9) Beldar made the following comment | Aug 23, 2004 4:59:43 PM | Permalink
Paul, my impression is that at least among those serving on the Swift Boats, getting both a Purple Heart and a Bronze Star, both arising out of events of a single day, without being hospitalized, is indeed unique to Sen. Kerry. But I have no first-hand knowledge; perhaps other readers could identify other examples of this having happened to any other Swiftees, or indeed, to anyone in Vietnam or other American wars, in addition to Sen. Kerry.
(10) GT made the following comment | Aug 24, 2004 1:22:21 AM | Permalink
The one point missed by all here is that every one of those medals had to be "signed off on" by commanding officers. It was TOTALLY up the the chain of command officers whether the medals were warranted. It's not like Kerry awarded the medals to himself. The accounts had to be documented and approved by his chain of command.
So is it your assertion that his entire chain of command was to enept to reasonably determine the authenticity of the supporting documentation? Or is it your assertion that they were so lacking in moral charactor that they hap hazzardly handed out medals?
(11) Beldar made the following comment | Aug 24, 2004 2:01:13 AM | Permalink
With due respect, GT, you're the one missing the point. The SwiftVets' allegations are that Kerry deliberately "gamed the system" and deceived the chain of command that approved four of his five medals. They've offered sound reasons for why that may be true.
This isn't just blowing smoke. Even without the full documentation available, the SwiftVets have offered up affidavit testimony from, for example, Captain George Elliott to support the "gaming the system" claim.
But if the SwiftVets are wrong, then the keys to the devastating rebuttal are in Kerry's exclusive hands. Unless and until he signs Standard Form 180, no one can see the "supporting documentation" that the Navy brass saw when they signed off on the medals, and no one can make a definitive evaluation as to whether Kerry did indeed "game the system" for his own benefit.
It's not unreasonable to infer that the reason Kerry won't permit the release of that supporting documentation is because he knows what's in it and how it came into being, and believes it would support the SwiftVets' position rather than his own. It's the old "coverup" concept.
Put another way, there's no indictment being made by the SwiftVets against the entire chain of command. Only against Kerry, who the SwiftVets believe was cunning enough to manipulate the system without setting off any alarm bells.
(12) Chris made the following comment | Aug 24, 2004 8:34:20 AM | Permalink
"It's not unreasonable to infer that the reason Kerry won't permit the release of that supporting documentation is because he knows what's in it and how it came into being, and believes it would support the SwiftVets' position rather than his own."
It's also not unreasonable to believe that he won't release his record because he doesn't want people of questionable ethics crawling through it and looking for more ways to impugn him--which is (surprise!) the exact same reason some of the SBV gave when asked to release THEIR records.
You give the benefit of the doubt to the accuser way, way too much, Beldar. Don't forget that you still have the burden of proof. Beyond hardcore partisans, the SBV arguments aren't earning creedence. They are, however, diverting attention from the issues and keeping Kerry on the defensive. Though, that's good enough a result, isn't it?
(13) jl cann made the following comment | Aug 24, 2004 11:22:59 AM | Permalink
Has anyone bothered to research the circustances of Bob Dole's Purple Heart? Was it in the line of duty or was it because of an accident? It would be interesting to know.
(14) ed made the following comment | Aug 24, 2004 3:09:09 PM | Permalink
Hmmm.
"Has anyone bothered to research the circustances of Bob Dole's Purple Heart? Was it in the line of duty or was it because of an accident? It would be interesting to know."
lol. Now that's laziness. You want dirt on Dole and you can't even be bothered to do your own googling?
(15) Beldar made the following comment | Aug 24, 2004 6:20:16 PM | Permalink
Chris, it's Kerry who's running for President on his war record, yet simultaneously withholding the documentary evidence that could either support or undercut his claims. It's fair to say that the SwiftVets have the initial burden of proof. They've met it to the best of their, or anyone's ability. Kerry's now resisting, but he's doing so via a cover-up. Finally, the character and honesty of our country's Commander in Chief is a legitimate issue.
JL Cann, I haven't bothered to find any links, but I know from reading within the last day or so that Dole was awarded two Purple Hearts. One was from a grenade fragment in his leg that put him out of action for a couple of days (obviously more serious than Kerry's bandaide wounds that caused him zero lost duty time). Dole makes light of this injury (the "mercurachrome" jest), and he is the first to admit that it was his own grenade that caused the fragment. But (in contrast to two of Kerry's Purple Heart wounds that also came from his own ordinance) Dole was under enemy fire; that's the key distinction. Dole's second Purple Heart came from enemy machinegun fire that almost destroyed his arm and put him into medical care and painful rehab for months.
The comments to this entry are closed.